The Theory of Creation & Human Understanding
TOCHU
Life evolution is Explained & validated Through Theory, reason, & logic.
All three also share a common origin: the Human mind.
TOCHU Explores The Human Mind’s Dominant ways of thinking & Understanding Life. TOCHU Implies that “all things in life are entirely different as well as exactly the same at the same time”.
TOCHU Explains how Human Evolution has & Will Continue To occur throughout time. more curiously, is investigates Why The Mind’s Own Evolution, Specifically prevented Humans From retaining or conceptualizing a clear understanding of our Evolutionthrough time.
Part I
We begin with some context of societal factors & constructs of Current Day Life that influence evolution:
“If two decisions are similar, we should repeat the choice which provides the best result”
“Competition is requirement to success”
“To be successful, one must achieve and perform better others”
“Successful people are willing to accept and admit failure”
“Confidence and ability are always
“If we Share our ideas without caution, we will loose them to others who want to steal them for their own use”
“we must respect our elders advice more than our peers, for their understanding is better from living a longer life”
“the best outcome is 100% or 1st”
“First or #1, is always better than Second or Third”
“scoring below 67% on an exam is insufficient or a Failure”
“Finding the needle in a haystack concept infers that the smallest one detail is the most important thing to discover as it will solve the situation at hand”
“Repetition is always good”
“Practice makes perfect”
Each of the above phrases are common ideals shared by most People in modern day society.
They are in many cases the exact structure needed to ensure society evolved in a controlled, logical, and Understood manner. This is also why TOCHU recognizes the need of these constructs as we evolved over time until now, when we as humans reached a point in our evolution that we no longer required such strong minded guidance Forward.
For example: let’s Consider the concept of “zero value, or nothing”.
When we place this value approximation on Something in life, how is that determined?
Try to visualize what ‘nothing of value’ is, or how anything in life could truly be “worthless” or not a something we should consider?
This same zero value basis today, is frequently applied to anything which we as individuals do not understand or know from prior life experience. Over time this has resulted in many holding a “fear of the unknown and Confidence in only what we know” This is further supported by the view that wrong is bad. That if we do not know something we Should avoid it, as it might result in a wrong outcome so its not worth the risk” TOCHU suggests that to create effective change, we must move away from this misunderstanding of confidence in only what we know, fear of the unknown, or being wrong.
Within Life, wrong is not always “wrong”.
“wrong” Itself can at times be a solution which leads to a greater outcome of a “right” solution.
This also supports the Concept of Never being ‘stuck’ in life. specifically each time we approach becoming ‘stuck’, we always learn to recognize the new inherent bias, and confirm our reforged belief that we still haven’t ‘found’ the entire complete answer. That itself in summary is how evolution of the Mind occurs.
The Law of Constance (“Same”)
The Law of Constance states that one or more things can be held in the same way at the same time over a period of time itself, without changing.
Think Consistency, Stability, constant.
TOCHU suggests that a Constant variable can only exist or be absolutely true when inside the faucet of time itself.
Therefore, if a constant is not inclusive of time, it should be perceived as a limit and questioned to understand if the constant is absolutely Valid.
When lacking the faucet of Time, the variable is not understood for what it fully represents, and is seen as constant both now and in the past, which is merely a perceived association to another time, that may or may not work as intended.
If we could understand what this basis signifies about an absolute constant of life, what would one look like? Can you name a few that come to mind? (Ignore Time for this activity).
To be absolutely true, we must explore what we used as an assumption in deriving the theory of constance:
Assumption - That two events can be repeated in exactly the same way, the inputs must produce exactly the same result more than once.
in assuming this as a possible outcome, we have already laid bias over the most important factor, time.
Time represents the inherent understanding that nothing is ever exactly the same in life.
It may be close, it may appear to feel or seem “the same”, but as we consider Time with this comparison, we are reminded how nothing can be exactly the same, just approximately close to the same or “Similar”.
how can a constant still be real? What makes this hold absolutely true?
To be true, a Constant must include at least two variables,
an input of things we understand produce what we currently would view as the same
a factor of understanding which implies that as much as this may appear as “the same”, It is also very much “Not the Same” or “different”.
So how is this achieved? Somehow it must be the same and also different at the sametime, to be then viewed as constant.
we already know that in some moments Something can appear to be the same and in others appear different, so why is this not recognized when we associate similar moments of today to our past experiences?
When understanding this, one can determine how a constant could be discovered as a theory and principle we use frequently in life, but not further explained beyond this one view of what a constant represents.
Take away Considerations:
if this theory is true, why is it now understood that challenging this belief is wrong or bad?
Why do we as people put down others for not sharing our view, simply because its not the same?
Why do we fear the unknown for simply being unable to conceptualize exactly what this ‘unknown’ idea is?
What about connecting two situations we believe are related, simply because of a common ‘intuition’ of sense memory. However, this sense memory in itself refutes the view of different as ‘wrong’.
by this determination we have already missed any chance of seeing the bias in Thinking from one view because we couldn’t recognize the bias. this bias was inherently something we always were meant to have, because its only a singular piece to a much greater understanding about the evolution of life. It is not wrong, neither absolutely right, which indicates there is more to understand.
The Theory Of Creation
Part II
The unexpected unpredictable totally unknown phenomenon of Covid gave Most humans scarcity or fear. Covid also gave some a gift, if they were willing to reject the standards of inherent understanding being correct in only one way. And because of this, I guarantee the theory of creation now that it’s discovered will only further become not any replacement to what we already have achieved.
That’s the beautiful thing of this theory, it doesn’t refute anything already confirmed and understood to make sense as we think or have thought. Instead, it suggests that everything we have confirmed and everything we haven’t, is exactly true. And further, that this truth is only part of a whole, not the entirety. That just because we do not know something, does not mean It’s to be feared, or to be assumed similar to anything else.
inherently not knowing something but wanting to, is exactly why we evolve in Life, but not The whole Reason. By understanding this further, we can then see both why we all believed and can logically agree with this view as a dominant part of why we evolve. However we can also then recognize that it is not the absolute or complete reason why. Consider the “Big Bang” which we still to this day have not been able to clearly understand for its exact influence in evolution, but we all can agree it occurred and had some influence on the evolution of life.
the Big Bang, or “other piece” to Life's evolution is something that we never recognized or considered simply because it wasn’t necessary in order to evolve life, until now. Welcome to the next step in our understanding of Life’s evolution through time.
That’s the thing we should want to understand. That simply because we find a constant of something, and it fits our approach to human understanding, inherently means it’s right? Or really that it produces the same feeling that we view as safe versus something we don’t know about? Why are people always first to assume fear, loss, risk, bad, over joy, gain, benefit, good? What in life has ever truly predicted those feelings being more or less important or impactful?
Why is that better assumption always preferred or even considered at all?
We accept a familiar feeling to find comfort in the unknown, which as one way of evolution makes sense, but just because it makes sense in one aspect, doesn’t mean that’s the full or complete view.
People already accept that there is something more to understand about life. So using that concept here, shouldn’t it be valid to suggest there is more we need to learn that isn’t something we can discover through what we know. And if that’s true, regardless of the societal bias of fearing the unknown, are we sure fearing the unknown is a 100% valid assumption?
The reason we are today struggling to grasp what this ‘other’ understanding might be, is because it’s beyond anything we know today, and we know a lot (so we think).
This is how we start to introduce how one might interpret how the other minds might think. By looking into how we think, we always for the entirety of human kind, have wanted to learn, understand, and know as much about our mind as possible. In fact, we for centuries have even referred to the mind as subconscious and conscious. We identified a way to understand how this affected our understanding of the mind, and we can visualize in some capacity how these two mindsets might work or behave. But then we get caught on the subconscious actions, which we know are the larger control over our being, yet we do not know why those things truly occur. What do we breathe air without needing to think to breathe in? Why do we learn how to have balance, interpret speech, see things in “color”. We just know it happens, but the why was always one of the largest unknowns of mankind’s evolution.
However, in almost every instance of a person having even a slight identification of this way of thinking, we then see how they are drawn then to a furthering of their own sense of self through the teachings of the mindset motivation speakers like Bob Proctor, Tony Robbins, Napoleon Hill, Joe Dispanoza, who in many ways have performed in their natural mind dominant, as we would expect for what is known as an influencer dominant mind. And it is beautiful what they have created. They have helped the world start again to believe in something more. Something worth living life fully again, in a time when the world is so desperately seeking something else.
What if this desire is also the exact reason why now, today, we all feel a bit confused of what to do next. This is observed in all parts of the world, regardless of the words we use to separate one person from another.
Why is that?, or how is that possible?, if our way of understanding, across society as a whole, is to identify differences and remove inefficient or non-essential traits suggesting the difference is a reason for not accepting this similarly might exist in everyone? But still keep in mind the lack of awareness or public bias is not known or even intended, it just happens, because as we will see, bias was meant to happen.
What if life (the creation & evolution of humans as people or beings) was bigger than discovering only the one small difference?
What if the key to understanding this other piece, was also literally so simple and evident but because of being unaware of how to access this understanding, we inherently from the start of life, held a bias against this understanding without even knowing we did or what that would do by having it.
This is where we challenge anyone reading this to think, and not in the way we know has proven valid, but in some way that goes against this method. “Against” as society views it, infers one versus another. The current understanding of the concept ‘against’ while valid in many uses for understanding in the known way, still has a bias of assuming only onemeaning to comparing things. However, as we already know, words assumed one thing can also in many known ways already hold another meaning.
That’s why moving forward, we must adapt how we understand, to not always apply the skills we have developed to form a conclusion, but instead we must use them in addition to other skills which we already inherently have within our being.
A way beyond the inherent bias of life, which is simply assuming or accepting anything as valid for being the only ‘good’ ‘correct’ choice.
Think Bigger.
Bigger in the way described implies large, or growth, and as taught is meant to say inclusive or accepting of life being different or the same, because you’re the “bigger person” because you ‘didn’t’ respond to a perceived incentive to result in a trap or unexpected loss.
If ‘being the bigger person’ implies being without bias of our individual self or perceived understanding of one’s situation to see beyond our individual view to consider the idea that maybe we just misunderstoodwhat we interpreted.
You see how right there we already have a valid theory from our known view, of when this bigger person view is held, a different view is possible to be seen and understood as potentially valid or correct.
This same instance can be looked at with the word forward.
Forward means inherently more than one thing. Forward to some people means at first the direction of objects like a car rolling forward down a street. We as people agree and can visualize this interpretation, so we know it’s a possible definition.
But there is another meaning, forward in ways that imply growth or advancement beyond something.
In fact as we look at the way language is designed, in many words which relate to advancing evolving or even as simple as changing, we as humans have confirmed and agreed one word can mean more than one thing.
So why do we not see what that truly means?!?!?!
Why do we continue to feel more and more stuck as people as a whole, when as far as we know, we are the most advanced or self aware we’ve ever known in the course of our understanding of human awareness?
All of these things bring us to the basis behind why the understanding we hold true above all else, is exactly what had to not only happen, but is why regardless of the differences or similarities identified between humans, we are still unable to answer the most basic concept, the one which holds the answer to life, the full reason for why humans have evolved.
And if we evolved only as we think we understand, why are there so many things we still don’t understand, and why can’t we grasp the reasons explaining why?
Even further, why if we can’t grasp it, is that any indication ever to fear something different?
It is critical that we must always have a basis to drive understanding from the use of know facts to validate the result.
However, now since we appear to be maxing out many of the evolutionary ideas for what we know, people need to discover this awareness of our bias to understanding, and truly, how blind we as people & society as a whole truly are, to the idea of understanding anything in any other way that might actually change our perception of life.
This understanding is not be better, just a necessary or essential aspect to understanding the evolution of life and how we as people have evolved since day 0.
It supports everything we’ve seen and recorded throughout our growth in understanding past decisions & outcomes. It supports our complete record of theory and logic. It also supports our understanding of religion, and the mindset programs now being lead by the worlds mind and body educators.
This realization was not an unknown for any intentional purpose, other than it was not necessary to know in our advancement in life, until now, as without this understanding today, life has become harder & harder to understand, and as people we fear how or what might be next for humankind or life in general. This again, because our view assumes a bias of singular, right vs. wrong. We always felt something else was missing in our concept of understanding life, but we couldn’t see exactly how to discover it and that is scary.
Below outlines the theory of creation, which proves using the concept of dominant ways of thinking, in a harmonious yet perfectly unique balance.
Theory of Creation - Principles & Inputs
Society of 2026:
Competitive not collaborative,
Secular in nature for furthering our understanding of things.
Assumption of better or worse, right or wrong.
Deciphering = pull apart and not any other view (which is in itself wrong)
Fear of being trapped at home
Fear of being unable to identify a risk before its too late
If its too good to be true, make sure its valid.
Incentives of Life:
Power
Control
Money
Love
Trust
Success/Achievement
Wealth
Creating Value
Fulfillment of Self
True Understanding of our mind requires foresight of three concepts:
What we think and know inherently and logically - mathematically and other basis of known factual believe to be true
The ability to understand that to be truly self aware we must not carry bias from anything we know, which infers that we must truly reject everything we inherently believe and trust to be valid, to see a clear view of beyond the ways we think is best, because even using a better or worse, comparative type language, only further demonstrates the depth of the problems existence across society.
What we believed to be true, is real, but does not have to always feel “good”or “bad”.
Once you can understanding these three things, the rest is quite simple.
Inherently we as people have already found a bunch of great tools and tricks we can and do use to evolve and create value by improving things used in day to day life.
Now I will remind you that this is the way society was focused on improving, and when you look at how this was created through the impact of incentives, it really starts to make a lot more logical sense than we may have thought.
One mind with at least two Dominant ways of thinking:
Influencer Dominant & Contributor Dominant
Both dominant minds create equal value,
both are Motivated by Societal incentives, but in different ways.
Influencers:
An influencer dominant mind is one which we can see demonstrated as the dominant societal preferred view. This is the mindset which creates through applying efficiency, savings, improvements of process, and innovation which follow the first way of understanding things, by identifying the differences and similarities and testing how they can interact to create new wonderful things. They create immense value and appreciate this feeling from the incentives of life, primarily around money, power, and control as main goals for achievement. This makes sense, because with proper balance of these things using the how & why logic of understanding, less unknown factors (which are scary today) means less risks of loss.
Influencer dominant minds speak from a place of power, dominance, control, and view money as a requirement for success, more money held = more power, control, and creation of value within society’s laws and norms.
Contributors:
The contributor mindset, when dominant is unique. This mindset is the one we forgot might exist, and it is within each and every. one of us, just not in a dominant position. This is the mindset which creates value in a very different but also just as important way, through doing something “different”. Contributors do not appreciate that society’s idea of limits is accurate, and in many cases they inherently reject the standard norms of society. They are just as incentivized as an influencer dominant mind, however they view these incentives as a way to go further. They too want money power and control, but not for the purpose of having and holding these incentives, but to do something more, something different, to create something new.
When looking further into these two dominant mindsets (of which there are more, we just are able to clearly identify these now. The incentives and the way each dominant way of thinking talks, is entirely different, and if not known, can create triggering events which incite an inherent fear or bias of the other person, especially if they are not of the same dominant way of thinking.
Contributor dominant minds speak from a place that is different. They are bored by the things society has held as most precious to achieve success. They understand the desires and incentives of money, power, and control, however they do not view them as the only thing needed for creation of value. Typically this mindset prefers other non-money value adds or changes in things that are not standard or expected within the framework of society’s laws and norms.
This is what the Power of You looks deeper into. What this means for people, why we did not know this was even possible, and further, why the world so desperately needs this now before we destroy everything out of fear and lack of understanding the bias of assuming we know the only way to understand life.
the Power of YOU
You, Me , all of us, we are all entirely different
Yet also entirely the same
at the same time.
that is the beauty of this discovery, to know and be able to understand why we needed to identify differences, but that it was not better or worse, just different.
Yes we are different, but we are also all the same, and we forgot the importance in understanding both was to our evolution in life.
Universal Law of Thirds
albert einstein, nikola Tesla, & benjamin franklin were all deemed genius for their contributions to Life’s evolution. They also share a common fascination and further understanding of the importance of “3” within life, which today is best known as “The Universal Law of Thirds”.
With this Understanding of Thirds, they were able to think far ahead of their Current time To develop life changing technology & share wisdom that still today supports many aspects of science, math, physics, theory, & the innovations which are defined through these knowledge areas.
To understand the universal law of thirds, begin by reviewing the significance of the number ‘one’ or ‘1’.
in math, ‘one’ can signify a whole value set or a whole piece of a larger Value Set.
Both also vary By arrangement of the ‘1’ in the represented figure
examples:
“10” is 1 whole set of Ten,
“100” is 1 whole set of hundred,
“1 of 2” is one part of two.
We use ‘one’ to signify many different ‘complete groupings’ or ‘whole value sets’ across Marth (Ex: Tens, Hundreds Thousands, Millions, Billions).
We also use ‘One’ to signify ‘Whole' or ‘Complete’ (1 Total of X, 1 Set of X, 100% of X, Etc.)
following this Concept a bit further, the number ‘one’ signifies many different “complete” Things in life. apply this to the concept of thirds.
In Thirds ‘one’ can signify both 1 part of 3 (1/3) or one whole 3 (3/3)
when looking at how this influences the way we use mathematics, consider the following equations, all of which are true & balance as stated using the above concept of thirds.
1 = 1
1+2+1+1=1
3+1+7=1
1+1+1 = 1
When one is representative of three parts to a whole value, any of the above can be verified true.
See the below explanations for each example & Notice Why They Prove True.
1 = 1 {Whole Value = Whole Value]
1+2+1+1=1 {Whole Value = Whole Value]
3+1+7=1 {Whole Value = Whole Value]
1+1+1 = 1 {Whole Value = Whole Value]
In each instance, what is being compared are inputs to a whole value between two sides of the “=” sign. When taking this understanding a bit further, it is easiest to understanding using mathematics & the concept of Absolute Sum Valuations.